LMU 20050237

Showing posts with label Why Trade Unions are Important in HRM?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Why Trade Unions are Important in HRM?. Show all posts

Saturday, August 7, 2021

Why Trade Unions are Important in HRM?


 

Image 01. www.golegal.co.za

Why Trade Unions are Important in HRM?

Introduction

Trade union, is an association of employees who have united together to accomplish goals in areas such as salaries and working conditions. The union negotiates agreements and conditions with bosses, keeping employee satisfaction high and defending employees from dangerous or partial working conditions.

Trade unions’ roles in and influence on the workplace are undisputable. They contribute to set up an industrial relation atmosphere, which permits HRM actions to happen. As a ‘collective voice’ representing organized employees within organization, unions air workplace differences for managerial consideration, therefore reducing turnover and refining confidence and collaboration (Deery, et al, 1999).

Functions of Trade Union

1. Militant Functions

The aim of this function is to certify acceptable salaries, secure better environments. When the unions fail to accomplish these aims by the method of collective bargaining and discussions, they adopt a method and put up a fight with the management in the form of work slowly tactics, strike, boycott, etc.

 

2. Fraternal Functions

Unions aims at rendering help to its members in times of need, and improving their efficiency. They take up welfare measures for improving the self-confidence of workers and create self confidence among them.

 

3. Social Functions

Organizing welfare events and also providing variety of services to their members and occasionally to the community of which they are a part.

 

4. Political functions

These functions include linking the union with a political party, serving the political party in joining members, collecting donations, looking for the help of political parties during the periods of strikes.

 

Figure 01. www.oecd-ilibrary.org

Why Unions?

Teague et al (2012) propose that successful corporation would have to encompass pre-existing collective bargaining practices, and management would have to adjust their right to manage; basically, establishing a partnership system with an element of oppositional actions and potential for non-cooperation. Collaboration alongside informal opposition and resistance within partnership specified a essentially pluralist view of partnership (Dundon and Dobbins, 2016).

Global Context

Europe and Latin America, by exploring the role played by trade unions have long traditions of collectivism, which offer trade unions with social legitimacy and power (Morley et al. 1996), and also the development of anti-union attitudes and insights in these continents.

Discussion and Conclusion

There is still much debate how HRM and union practices might be combined and applied. What cannot be denied is that the previous has become progressively widespread as a way of soliciting the pledge and support of employees in the direction of organizational goals and objectives.

 

References


Abbott, K. (2007) Employment Relations: Integrating Industrial Relations and Human Resource Management. Available at <https://www.businessperspectives.org> (Accessed on 07th August 2021)


Deery, S and Erwin, P. and Iverson, R (1999) Industrial Relations Climate, Attendance Behavior and the Role of Trade Unions


Dundon, T. and Dobbins, T. (2016). Militant partnership: a radical pluralist analysis of workforce dialectics. Work, Employment & Society. Advance online publication.

Available at <https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk> (Accessed on 07th August 2021)


Morley et al. (1996) PH regulation of connexin43: molecular analysis of the gating particle

Sharma, S.K. and Sharma, B. (2014) Human Resource Management and Trade Unions (HRMTU) Available at <http://www.ijtef.org/papers/346-N10002.pdf> (Accessed on 07th August 2021)

Teague, P., W. Roche & D. Hann (2012) “Toward a Strategic Theory on Workplace Conflict Management”, Ohio State Journal in Dispute Resolution, 24(1) 143-190