Designing of Executive Compensation Plans - That Actually Drives the Performance?
Image from https://blog.v-comply.com/executive-pay-linked-performance/
Designing of Executive Compensation Plans - That actually drives the Performance?
Executive
compensation can have a big impact on an organization. When
compensation is managed carefully, it lines up people’s conduct with the
company’s plan and creates better performance. If it’s achieved poorly, the
effects can be shocking, the loss of key talent, demotivation, misaligned purposes.
As organizations work their way
through the Covid 19-related economic crisis, many companies, for instance,
have cut pay for senior executives. Extra pressing will be how to think about
the goals implanted within incentive plans. Numerous targets won’t be attainable
given the new financial realities and thus will no longer serve as effective
incentives.
The relationship between executive compensation and firm
performance, is yet to be completely understood (Mehran, 1995). Jensen and
Murphy (1990) claimed that equity-based rather than cash compensation presents
managers with the correct incentive to maximize firm value.
As per the FW Cook, 83% of the 250 major
S&P 500 companies use a prescribed annual incentive plan, A good
compensation system always begins with an organization’s strategic goals. Misaligned
compensation is with them, worry ensues.
Figure from https://slideplayer.com/slide/6845883/ |
HR's Role
Designing and managing an executive compensation program is diverse. The most basic role an HR professional plays is being in a position to inform management of the benefits, costs and range of options in launching or improving an executive compensation plan.
HR professionals are key in determining what in-house and outside expertise is necessary and sufficient to handle an executive compensation program. Every organization needs some sort of outside proficiency for the design and management of an effective executive compensation program.
The failure of various executive compensation programs can be linked to
- Failure to obtain staff input
in plans that will essentially incentivize executive performance.
- Failure to clearly express
performance goals up front.
- Failure to state performance
goals that are within the scope of influence of the target employee.
- Measuring staff performance
according to values that were not stated in written documentation.
- Provided that job descriptions that do not implied the objectives set forth in the executive compensation plan
Plan Design
Making
an effective executive compensation plan requires organizations to balance stockholder
alignment, performance-based pay, hiring and retaining, and the calculation of
cost versus perceived value. A long-term reward plan with performance-based
incentive vehicles can help accomplish that equilibrium.
Present
trends in executive compensation:
- A higher percentage of
executive pay is linked to performance.
- Pay incentives are more intensive
on long-term outcomes.
- Companies have reduced on privileges
for executives.
References
Bennett, B., et al (2015). Compensation goals and firm performance. Retrieved from Available at <http://apps.olin.wustl.edu/faculty/Gopalan/15_Compensation%20Goals%20Firm%20Performance.pdf> (Accessed on 30 July 2021)
Center on Executive Compensation. (n.d.) Basics of executive compensation. Available at <http://www.execcomp.org/Basics/Basic/What-Is-Executive-Compensation> (Accessed on 30 July 2021)
Groysberg, B., et al (2021) Principles for designing executive pay Available at <https://hbr.org/topic/compensation> (Accessed on 30 July 2021)
Jensen, M., and Murphy, K., (1990). Performance pays and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, (98): 225-264. Available at <https://leeds-faculty.colorado.edu/bhagat/Jensen-Murphy.pdf> (Accessed on 30 July 2021)
Lytle, T. (2013). Agenda: Compensation linking executive pay to performance. HR Magazine. Available at from <https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/pages/0913-say-on-pay.aspx> (Accessed on 30 July 2021)
Mehran, H., (1995). Executive compensation, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, (38): 163-184. Available at <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0304405X9400809F> (Accessed on 30 July 2021)